OpenHunt for Android is on Google Play — take your plan into the field. Send it to your phone →

Method — hunter density

How hunter density is computed

Every hunter asks “will it be crowded?” and almost nothing answers it. Draw odds say whether you get a tag; harvest rate says whether people succeed; this number says what the ground will feel like. We compute it as tags per accessible public square mile — and we show the naive total-area figure alongside, because that is the version other apps print and the two can differ by five times.

The formula

naive      = season tags ÷ (unit area / 640)
accessible = season tags ÷ ((public acres − landlocked acres) / 640)

Season tags is the hunt code’s total quota across every residency pool, from the same published agency statistics that power the draw tables. Public acres is the PAD-US union clipped to the unit; landlocked acres are the public parcels our reachability model says you cannot legally reach — the same figures printed on every unit page, with their own method note. Landlocked ground is a subset of public ground by construction, so the subtraction is sound.

Why correct for public land

On a unit that is 18% public, every tag holder who doesn’t hold private permission is compressed into that 18%. Dividing tags by the whole unit’s area understates what the public ground actually feels like by roughly the inverse of the public share. The naive figure is still shown — labelled — so our number stays comparable with the one you may have seen elsewhere.

What this number is not

It is a season total, not a headcount on opening morning. A 10-day rifle season concentrates its tags in time; a four-month archery season dilutes them. Season dates are not yet part of the draw artifacts, so we do not claim a per-day figure — when they are, a season-adjusted version will say exactly how it is computed here first. It also counts tags, not hunters afield: where agencies publish actual hunter counts we show those on the harvest lines, and the two can legitimately differ.

When the number is absent

A hunt that covers a unit group sums its members’ areas. A hunt we cannot place on ground at all — Utah’s odds publish unit names rather than ids, and some Montana combo codes span districts we cannot resolve — shows no density rather than a guessed one. Absent beats invented, everywhere on this site.

Surfaced on the draw tables, the party planner and every unit page.