Units / Montana / District 370

Same number, different ground: Antelope district 370 →

Unit research · Montana · District 370

District 370 — Montana

34% public hunting land across 118,549 ac. Real backcountry here — 33% of the public land sits more than a mile from any road. Watch the checkerboard: 8,412 ac of public land has no public route in.

Open in map

Deer draw odds (1)Elk draw odds (1)Odds and pins: free, no account

District 370Full map — ownership, roads, wind →

4,310–8,560 ft

elevation range

34%

public hunting land

33%

of public >1 mi from a road

8,412 ac

landlocked public

0.90

road miles per mi²

0 mi

trails on public land

Computed from primary government data by the AGPL pipeline. See the code →

Tags & season

Draw hunts on this ground.

2 limited-entry deer and elk hunts are drawn on District 370: apply in the Montana draw, by the agency's deadline below.

Deer tag · 1 draw hunt (2026)$5.00 resident · $5.00 nonresident

Elk tag · 1 draw hunt (2026)$9.00 resident · $9.00 nonresident

Plus: Conservation license$8.00 resident · $10.00 nonresident

Season dates: see Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks's regulations

2026 Deer/Elk/Antelope regulations (FWP PDF) ↗

FWP license fees for 2026 (fee schedule PDF) ↗Draw odds for Montana deer →Draw odds for Montana elk →How the Montana draw works →

Fees and draw dates from Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, 2026, verified 2026-08-05 — past its verify-by date, confirm with the agency. Tag type from the agency's published draw statistics: a district that appears in none of them has no limited-entry hunt we know of. Source: FWP license fees for 2026 (fee schedule PDF) · 2026 Deer/Elk/Antelope regulations (FWP PDF) · 2026 Moose/Sheep/Goat/Bison regulations (FWP PDF) · FWP application & drawing dates · MCA 87-2-505 (B-10 combination, $1,312 eff. 2026-03-01).

Land & access

■ Forest Service 24%■ BLM 10%▨ Parks & other public 4%□ Private 62%

Unit area118,549 ac

Public hunting land39,901 ac (34%)

Parks & other public4,702 ac · Unknown manager, Other state, Local government

Landlocked public8,412 ac (21.1%)

Deer draw pressure1.0 tags/mi² public (0.27 of total area)

Elk draw pressure2.9 tags/mi² public (0.78 of total area)

Walk-in access20,198 ac

Motorized routes (MVUM + roads)166 mi

Mapped trails on public land0 mi

Backcountry

Public land >1 mi from a road13,363 ac (33% of public)

Road density0.90 mi/mi²

Managed byForest Service 29k ac · BLM 11k ac

Elevation4,310–8,560 ft

Median elevation5,310 ft

Median slope9°

Where the ground sits

4,310 ft8,560 ft

Tap or hover the bars for each elevation band

Slope mix

Which way the slopes face

N 20%

E 31%

S 22%

W 27%

Share of ground steeper than 5° — flat ground has no facing

North slopes hold shade, cover and snow; south slopes open first.

USGS 3DEP 1 arc-second (30 m), slope at native resolution in a local metric projection, sampled on a 200 m grid. See the code →

Unit intelligence report · Pro, $5 a month or $49 a year

3,522 ac of this district has burned — 3% of the unit. The full report assembles it into one printable document and keeps it current as the facts change.

Open the report →

Season conditions — measured, not vibes

Historical temperatures · 2000–2025

Normals for 2000–2025 — tap or hover for a month

Measured at HELENA REGIONAL AIRPORT, 65 km from the unit’s center and ~1,400 ft below its median elevation — expect the unit to run colder. NOAA ISD-Lite hourly observations.

Harvest — agency survey estimates

Elk · 2025

103 harvested

no unit-level hunter count published

52 bulls · 49 cows · 2 calves

Elk harvest · 2004–2025 · 69 → 103

Deer · 2025 · success = harvest ÷ hunters

18.4% success

95 taken by 515 hunters · 3,111 days afield

72 bucks · 22 does · 0 fawns

NR 32% · Res 18% success

Deer hunter success · 2004–2025 · 30% → 18%

Pronghorn · 2025

68 harvested

no unit-level hunter count published

41 bucks · 27 does · 0 fawns

Pronghorn harvest · 2004–2025 · 52 → 68

FWP survey estimates per hunting district, split resident and nonresident. These are estimates from FWP's hunter survey rather than registration counts — its own column legend reads "Estimate of…" — and that holds even for the limited-permit species, so they are not the same quantity as a state that counts checked animals. Bighorn sheep, moose and mountain goat are numbered in their own district systems, separate from the deer and elk districts and using the same numbers for different ground, so each is shown on its own geography. FWP publishes per-district hunter and effort estimates for deer, sheep, moose and goat; elk and antelope pages show harvest and composition without a district-level success rate, because inventing one from statewide effort would be wrong at this grain. Success rates are derived as harvest ÷ hunters from FWP's own published columns wherever both are given. Source: FWP Harvest Estimates search (myfwp.mt.gov) · FWP Harvest Estimates CSV export (sheep, moose and goat).

How these numbers are made

public_land_pct = public_area / unit_area
landlocked = public ∖ reachable(roads, corners)
remote = public ∖ buffer(roads, 1 mi)
# AGPL — read the pipeline →

Computed, not curated: no paid research team, no opinions dressed as data. If a number looks wrong, tell us at support@openhuntmaps.com — the fix ships for everyone.

Nearby districts

District 35081% public · 16% remote District 38042% public · 19% remote District 31881% public · 6% remote District 3114% public · 19% remote District 32042% public · 18% remote District 34042% public · 13% remote

Ready to scout it?

Everything on this page, live on the map — ownership, boundaries, roads, and your own waypoints.

Open District 370 in the map